cheekbones3: (Default)
cheekbones3 ([personal profile] cheekbones3) wrote2011-04-30 09:22 am

A thought

I'm still on balance a royalist. In large part because republicanism entails a load more politicians - they'd cost how much more than a monarch?

The old adage about anyone wanting power being immediately banned from having it is appropriate here; royalty serves this purpose very well.


Anyway, to Beltane. See you non-hippies some time tomorrow.