cheekbones3 (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
cheekbones3) wrote2011-06-18 10:30 am
cheekbones3) wrote2011-06-18 10:30 am
(no subject)
Another discovery with Chrome - it really doesn't appear to be much good at running Flash applications.
In summary at the moment, it generally seems better at memory management than Firefox, and it appears more stable. It loses on the lack of quality/scope in its add-ons. I'll ahve to stick with it for the moment, but I might split time between them.
In summary at the moment, it generally seems better at memory management than Firefox, and it appears more stable. It loses on the lack of quality/scope in its add-ons. I'll ahve to stick with it for the moment, but I might split time between them.