Anyone got advice on how to shrink an image without losing detail? I'm finding that the image I'm shrinking loses quality badly in both jpg and gif formats, and I'd really like to make some new icons!
I used Picassa (by google) to sharpen image and crop then exported to 100 pixles (to explain picassa has a function which allows you to edit and crop photos without affecting the original stored image. The images are then exported as copies which you can set to be any size you want)
Mine came out quite well and the detail is still there (see above)
That's a design based on an Ogham Stave for hazel. We were out for a group away-weekend, the group being Earth Point for this year's Beltane Fire Festival. Now there's a couple of things that you can look up online, much easier than me explaining them, and there should be some good picture about!
Yep I've certainly noticed her openness and acceptance of people. Puts me at ease around her and the rest of the group, which is just what I need! I wasn't sure about her initially, but any worries I had have disappeared. Although it may be a tough task, I will force myself to pass on the kisses!
I presume by the way that you've got a new icon that you already fixed this ;)
Just a little FYI for web graphics (not that I'm particularly an expert): 72 dpi is around the resolution of a screen, so generally having resolution any higher doesn't make any difference. JPEG is a lossy format, which means that every time you save it you lose information due to the compression algorithm used. GIF, in the mean time, is an evil evil 256 colour format which was (and may still be) the intellectual property of CompuServe. That is, don't use GIFs. For web graphics I recommend PNG format /except/ where transparency is involved, because there is a render bug in Internet Explorer which makes the transparent area a big grey box (go Microsoft).
You can do a lot worse than using the GIMP for graphics. Avoiding using a lossy format until you are finished sorting out your graphics is also a good way to avoid losing detail. Ever time you save a jpeg is does some funky interpolation across the image, and "smoothes" it a little (to reduce the info it needs to store).
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 08:46 pm (UTC)Mine came out quite well and the detail is still there (see above)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 09:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 09:22 pm (UTC)Is that the Earth-y design for this year...oh and do you know Kat she's doing Earth this year.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 09:23 pm (UTC)I like it :D
Why is there lines on your face?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 09:41 pm (UTC)I do indeed know Kat, you know her from redness last year? We shared a (rather damp and cold) tent on Saturday night.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 09:43 pm (UTC)That's a design based on an Ogham Stave for hazel. We were out for a group away-weekend, the group being Earth Point for this year's Beltane Fire Festival. Now there's a couple of things that you can look up online, much easier than me explaining them, and there should be some good picture about!
How are you getting on?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 09:44 pm (UTC)give her kisses when you see her next.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 09:52 pm (UTC)All I can ask is that you try your best kiss wise.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 10:42 pm (UTC):oP
PS first comment made no sense, having re-read.
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 06:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 06:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 06:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 07:01 am (UTC)Just a little FYI for web graphics (not that I'm particularly an expert): 72 dpi is around the resolution of a screen, so generally having resolution any higher doesn't make any difference. JPEG is a lossy format, which means that every time you save it you lose information due to the compression algorithm used. GIF, in the mean time, is an evil evil 256 colour format which was (and may still be) the intellectual property of CompuServe. That is, don't use GIFs. For web graphics I recommend PNG format /except/ where transparency is involved, because there is a render bug in Internet Explorer which makes the transparent area a big grey box (go Microsoft).
You can do a lot worse than using the GIMP for graphics. Avoiding using a lossy format until you are finished sorting out your graphics is also a good way to avoid losing detail. Ever time you save a jpeg is does some funky interpolation across the image, and "smoothes" it a little (to reduce the info it needs to store).
no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 05:23 pm (UTC)