(no subject)
Aug. 23rd, 2006 06:22 pmSaw Radiohead (and Beck) last night, and it was good, even though I don't know about four of their albums. An excellent show of musicianship and songwriting, and I appreciate them a lot more now. Beck were excellent, and I enjoyed their puppetry too! Doubt I'll buy any albums of theirs though, that sort of music just doesn't do it for me when recorded. It was easily the most lightweight, mainstream gig I've ever been to, so I missed the urge to go and "fuck shit up" as numerous vocalists would say, but I'm glad I went. Muse on Thursday.
Challenge Cup final on Saturday too! Am debating whether to find a pub in which to watch the game, or whether to find a telly at a friendly and hopefully interested person's house. Invitations welcome! I could also possibly squat in Dee's living room, if Keith's going to be about...St.Helens v Huddersfield it is, and if Huddersfield play anything like they did in the semi-final which I saw, it should be an excellent final.
I'll finish for today with a quick grammar lesson:
"It's shite." = "It is shite."
"Its shite" = "The shite that belongs to it."
In other words, the usual rule of an apostrophe for possession is reversed in the case of "its" and "it's", simply (I believe) to remove the ambiguity that would otherwise ensue. This mistake is made surprisingly widely, makes its (you see?) way into academic papers, and other surprising places. A little thought please!
Challenge Cup final on Saturday too! Am debating whether to find a pub in which to watch the game, or whether to find a telly at a friendly and hopefully interested person's house. Invitations welcome! I could also possibly squat in Dee's living room, if Keith's going to be about...St.Helens v Huddersfield it is, and if Huddersfield play anything like they did in the semi-final which I saw, it should be an excellent final.
I'll finish for today with a quick grammar lesson:
"It's shite." = "It is shite."
"Its shite" = "The shite that belongs to it."
In other words, the usual rule of an apostrophe for possession is reversed in the case of "its" and "it's", simply (I believe) to remove the ambiguity that would otherwise ensue. This mistake is made surprisingly widely, makes its (you see?) way into academic papers, and other surprising places. A little thought please!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 09:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 10:09 pm (UTC)She's not, however, a Beck fan. *lol*
no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 10:31 pm (UTC)