Ramble

[cheekbones3]

Particularly surprising recently was the Government's decision to go with actual scientific advice with regard to culling badgers to control bovine TB.

The independent study on the area originally recommended that a cull would not be effective, a couple of possible reasons being that badgers would extend their ranges if populations were reduced, therefore spreading TB further, and that there's no actual proven link between badgers and TB outbreaks in cattle.

Then came (I missed the reason why) the Government expert that recommended the opposite, and I fully expected them to go with this advice, assuming it was the usual "scientific" advice handily organised when the independent advice wasn't in line with desired policy. But actually, they've gone with the original advice saying that a cull was unjustified, which it does indeed appear to be.

Maybe, sometimes the right decision occurs? I wonder what caused that. Maybe the whinging farmers are losing political clout?

Comments

[hardcore-pixee.livejournal.com]

Indeed I can! I have both a corn and a royal. Personally I prefer my royal, he's just great. My corn is a lot faster and likes to try and escape whereas my royal is the most docile, friendly snake I've eveer met. I wasn't planning on buying him when I did, but I was asked if I wanted to hold him and he was great.
My corn is a slightly better feeder, but I think it's because my royal is just really stupid. He does eat perfectly well, but I need to wriggle a mouse at him so he realises he's meant to eat it.
I think in general royals are better to handle and are known to be really good. The best thing to do is hold a few different ones and choose the calmest. Mine is still a baby but he just sits and behaves so well. Everyone loves him when they meet him.
I hope that helps!