(no subject)
Apr. 6th, 2003 09:20 pmThink I should update for the nth time this weekend? Nah...don't think I could say anything useful at the moment. I'd love to say something, but I better let myself stew in my own crypticism/crypticness/crypticality/erm is there a word?
Good race by the way...nice crashes. Me happy!
Good race by the way...nice crashes. Me happy!
Re: Here you are...
Re: Here you are...
Date: 2003-04-06 03:30 pm (UTC)Re: Here you are...
Date: 2003-04-06 05:36 pm (UTC)Re: Here you are...
Date: 2003-04-06 05:59 pm (UTC)Do you think it does?
no subject
Date: 2003-04-06 06:14 pm (UTC)in a way i do, but mostly because it's american and their words are often quite different. it gets the meaning across which is good. that is the point of words, really.
i think "should be used or not" is too hard and fast. it depends on context..
i wish i could think straight. damn two o'clock in the morning to the mono-sodium-glutemate pits of hell.
no subject
Date: 2003-04-06 06:26 pm (UTC)I agree with you in principle - but in this case UK-English doesn't have a noun form of cryptic. US-English does. So it makes sense that if you're looking for a noun form of cryptic you'd go with the one already in use, even if it wasn't coined in the UK. If you're dealing with a choice of words (illusory vs illusionary) then yes, you'd probably go for the one most popular in your own country, though not necessarily so - and even less so now the internet is creating its own wierd hybrid form of English. Still, it's all tom-ah-to, tom-ay-to, really!